| || |
According to 91 historians I assume chosen by C-Span, Bush was way worse.
Obama was listed as 12th best, GW was 33rd.
Although I would expect that for Obama, and even for Bush, it's a bit early on to be able to fully evaluate the effects of their policies and actions.
It's impossible to compare presidents since they all face different challenges.
You must be kidding. This belongs on the political humor board.
Thanks for all the different perspectives already...
I mean, a president from 100 years ago is hard to gauge performance compared to a more modern president...
Bush led to obama and obama led us to trump.
Who does the left think is worse again?
And Obama, had pushed your country quite far left in a short time, so, I could see some pushback towards conservatism... I think when Clinton robbed Bernie, that was what sealed things for trump... She was just far too corrupt and not very shy about it.
So, a big portion of trumps support was likely due to the anti-Clinton contingent... Which the media seems obsessed with trying to prove was Russians.
How about if you think in terms of each isolation, in the sense of looking at all the good and bad things added together compared? Would that be a way to make a comparison?