Page 8 of 8 FirstFirst ... 678
Results 71 to 78 of 78
Thanks Tree55Thanks

Thread: 7 bad science and health ideas that should die with 2016

  1. #71
    Senior Member bmanmcfly's Avatar
    Joined
    Oct 2014
    Posts
    10,680
    Thanks
    1913

    From
    C-A-N-A-D-A-Eh
    Quote Originally Posted by BigLeRoy View Post
    Why would or should he retract a scientifically accurate paper?!?? You appear to think that the paper has been debunked. It most certainly has not. Rather, the efforts to debunk it have been rudely debunked.
    You're right about rudely, but greatly over generous to suggest debunked...

  2. #72
    Radical Centrist BigLeRoy's Avatar
    Joined
    Jan 2016
    Posts
    21,220
    Thanks
    18397

    From
    Colorado
    Quote Originally Posted by bmanmcfly View Post
    You're right about rudely, but greatly over generous to suggest debunked...
    I sincerely doubt that you ever read the original paper by Mann. I doubt you read any of the attempts to debunk it. And I very much doubt that you read any of the scientific articles that debunked those feeble attempts. Clearly, you are not aware that the National Academy of Sciences has carefully reviewed the entire controversy, and has issued a statement offering FULL support for the conclusions of the original Mann article on the hockey stick. You WOULD know that, if you had done even the most cursory investigation on your own, but...............................

  3. #73
    Senior Member bmanmcfly's Avatar
    Joined
    Oct 2014
    Posts
    10,680
    Thanks
    1913

    From
    C-A-N-A-D-A-Eh
    Quote Originally Posted by BigLeRoy View Post
    I sincerely doubt that you ever read the original paper by Mann. I doubt you read any of the attempts to debunk it. And I very much doubt that you read any of the scientific articles that debunked those feeble attempts. Clearly, you are not aware that the National Academy of Sciences has carefully reviewed the entire controversy, and has issued a statement offering FULL support for the conclusions of the original Mann article on the hockey stick. You WOULD know that, if you had done even the most cursory investigation on your own, but...............................
    Your claim: I'm dumb because *insert appeal to authority*

    Sound logic...

  4. #74
    Radical Centrist BigLeRoy's Avatar
    Joined
    Jan 2016
    Posts
    21,220
    Thanks
    18397

    From
    Colorado
    Quote Originally Posted by bmanmcfly View Post
    Your claim: I'm dumb because *insert appeal to authority*

    Sound logic...
    For your education and edification and enlightenment, not that any of us here expect you to take advantage of such opportunities:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hockey_stick_graph

  5. #75
    Senior Member bmanmcfly's Avatar
    Joined
    Oct 2014
    Posts
    10,680
    Thanks
    1913

    From
    C-A-N-A-D-A-Eh
    Quote Originally Posted by BigLeRoy View Post
    For your education and edification and enlightenment, not that any of us here expect you to take advantage of such opportunities:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hockey_stick_graph
    Too bad you ceded ANY credibility on this issue already. Cost of playing dumb for pages before finally raising something relevant.

  6. #76
    Radical Centrist BigLeRoy's Avatar
    Joined
    Jan 2016
    Posts
    21,220
    Thanks
    18397

    From
    Colorado
    Quote Originally Posted by bmanmcfly View Post
    Too bad you ceded ANY credibility on this issue already. Cost of playing dumb for pages before finally raising something relevant.
    Too bad that so many of your posts make ZERO sense. Such as this one. Call it Exhibit A.

  7. #77
    Senior Member bmanmcfly's Avatar
    Joined
    Oct 2014
    Posts
    10,680
    Thanks
    1913

    From
    C-A-N-A-D-A-Eh
    Quote Originally Posted by BigLeRoy View Post
    Too bad that so many of your posts make ZERO sense. Such as this one. Call it Exhibit A.
    Lmao... playing too dumb to understand simple English? It's never worked to make you look smart yet, but keep doubling down.

  8. #78
    Radical Centrist BigLeRoy's Avatar
    Joined
    Jan 2016
    Posts
    21,220
    Thanks
    18397

    From
    Colorado
    Quote Originally Posted by bmanmcfly View Post
    Lmao... playing too dumb to understand simple English? It's never worked to make you look smart yet, but keep doubling down.
    I'm sorry, but I have not ceded ANY 'credibility' on the issue of Mann's hockey stick graph. It is valid, and you just don't understand the science behind it. Not only that, but you have no actual INTEREST in understanding the science behind it. Like shamefully many millions of Americans these days, you actually REVEL in your ignorance, and trumpet it for all the world to hear.

    Which MOST people would find embarrassing.

Page 8 of 8 FirstFirst ... 678

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 291
    Last Post: 29th June 2016, 09:48 PM
  2. Replies: 92
    Last Post: 6th July 2015, 10:26 AM
  3. Another anti-science Republican on the House science committee..
    By teamosil in forum Political Discussion
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 8th October 2012, 03:48 AM
  4. Obama backs 4 GOP health care ideas
    By Winn in forum Healthcare
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 8th March 2010, 11:46 AM
  5. Global Warming Science isn't Science
    By conservative in forum Science and Technology
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 2nd December 2007, 01:50 PM

Tags for this Thread


Facebook Twitter RSS Feed