Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 24
Thanks Tree9Thanks

Thread: Record Temperature Streak Bears Anthropogenic Footprint

  1. #1
    Radical Centrist BigLeRoy's Avatar
    Joined
    Jan 2016
    Posts
    26,140
    Thanks
    21606

    From
    Colorado

    Record Temperature Streak Bears Anthropogenic Footprint

    This article is pretty self-explanatory:

    https://www.sciencedaily.com/release...0810104949.htm

    Comments?
    Thanks from BitterPill

  2. #2
    RNG
    RNG is offline
    Moderator RNG's Avatar
    Joined
    Jan 2015
    Posts
    8,755
    Thanks
    5067

    From
    Between everywhere
    That just confirms the results of most (real) studies. But of course the deniers will cry "paid for money grubbing scientist".

    https://arstechnica.com/science/2016...for-the-money/
    Thanks from BigLeRoy

  3. #3
    Radical Centrist BigLeRoy's Avatar
    Joined
    Jan 2016
    Posts
    26,140
    Thanks
    21606

    From
    Colorado
    Quote Originally Posted by RNG View Post
    That just confirms the results of most (real) studies. But of course the deniers will cry "paid for money grubbing scientist".

    https://arstechnica.com/science/2016...for-the-money/
    The study I linked to is the first study (that I know of) to specifically look at the statistical probability of having three record-breaking years (2014, 2015, 2016) in a row. EXTREMELY unlikely----only a 0.03% chance-----without human influences vis--vis greenhouse gases.

    Just so others reading are clear on this: that is NOT three percent; it is three-HUNDREDTHS of ONE percent.
    Thanks from chaos

  4. #4
    Radical Centrist BigLeRoy's Avatar
    Joined
    Jan 2016
    Posts
    26,140
    Thanks
    21606

    From
    Colorado
    Where are all the usual crazies who dispute AGW?

    Nothing to say?

    Don't 'unnerstan' probabilities?!?

  5. #5
    Veteran Member TNVolunteer73's Avatar
    Joined
    Nov 2014
    Posts
    29,860
    Thanks
    7701

    From
    TN
    This is a natural warming period and it is the coolest major warming period in 400,000 years..

    The Warming periods come in REGULAR CYCLES and HAVE similar peaks.. (This is the coolest of the 5 in the last 400,000 years).

    This warming period is right on schedule.




    Ever hears of a sine Wave also note in the pasts warming periods, the WARMING PRECEEDED CO2 increase, just like this warming period


    notice the patter in the warming and cooling and this:




    MMGW hoax mongers have played you like a dime store kazoo..

  6. #6
    Southern Strategy Liberal OldGaffer's Avatar
    Joined
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    36,754
    Thanks
    38766

    From
    Nashville, TN
    Quote Originally Posted by TNVolunteer73 View Post
    This is a natural warming period and it is the coolest major warming period in 400,000 years..

    The Warming periods come in REGULAR CYCLES and HAVE similar peaks.. (This is the coolest of the 5 in the last 400,000 years).

    This warming period is right on schedule.




    Ever hears of a sine Wave also note in the pasts warming periods, the WARMING PRECEEDED CO2 increase, just like this warming period


    notice the patter in the warming and cooling and this:




    MMGW hoax mongers have played you like a dime store kazoo..
    Are those graphs from Exxon-Mobil? The Heartland Institute? And why do they cut off in 1950, almost 70 years ago?
    Thanks from Panzareta and labrea

  7. #7
    RNG
    RNG is offline
    Moderator RNG's Avatar
    Joined
    Jan 2015
    Posts
    8,755
    Thanks
    5067

    From
    Between everywhere
    Quote Originally Posted by OldGaffer View Post
    Are those graphs from Exxon-Mobil? The Heartland Institute? And why do they cut off in 1950, almost 70 years ago?
    Well, someone who thinks that a sawtooth function has any commonality with a sine wave needs some upgrading of math skills.

    And whoever made up those other charts don't want us to see the last 70 years of data since that's where all the results of man's influence is shown.
    Thanks from labrea and chaos

  8. #8
    Veteran Member TNVolunteer73's Avatar
    Joined
    Nov 2014
    Posts
    29,860
    Thanks
    7701

    From
    TN
    Quote Originally Posted by OldGaffer View Post
    Are those graphs from Exxon-Mobil? The Heartland Institute? And why do they cut off in 1950, almost 70 years ago?
    No those Graphs are from the UN.. OOPS

    Temperature and CO2 consentration in the atmosphere since 400 000 years - Climate Change

    Me thinks I caught you in a bald face lie.

    Check the link... it has the UNEP seal of approval.




    You can say TNVolunteer73, Curse you, you foiled me again.

  9. #9
    Southern Strategy Liberal OldGaffer's Avatar
    Joined
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    36,754
    Thanks
    38766

    From
    Nashville, TN
    That link is over 20 years old.....but even then...

    From your own link:
    20. Projected anthropogenic CO2 emissions from fossil fuel use, deforestation and cement production are shown for some of the IPCC emission scenarios. The highest emission scenario - IS92e - assumes moderate population growth, high economic growth, high fossil fuel availability, and a phase out of nuclear power; and the lowest emission scenario - IS92c - assumes low population growth, low economic growth, and severe constraints on fossil fuel supplies.
    Understanding how CO2 concentrations in the atmosphere will change in the future requires carbon cycle models which model the relationship between emissions and atmospheric concentrations. The estimated CO2 concentration in the atmosphere for each emission scenario (calculated using the Bern model) is shown in the second figure. All scenarioes show increased concentrations that are well above pre-industrial levels by 2100 (75 to 220% higher).
    Climate induced environmental changes cannot be reversed quickly. Even if the anthropogenic emissions of CO2 are stabilized or reduced, the CO2 content in the atmosphere will still increase for some time.

    They support man made climate change, just like your link to Oak Ridge labs did several months ago....you are your own worst enemy....

    http://old.grida.no/climate/vital/22.htm
    Thanks from Panzareta

  10. #10
    Veteran Member Panzareta's Avatar
    Joined
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    29,817
    Thanks
    17779

    From
    On a happy trail
    Quote Originally Posted by TNVolunteer73 View Post
    No those Graphs are from the UN.. OOPS

    Temperature and CO2 consentration in the atmosphere since 400 000 years - Climate Change

    Me thinks I caught you in a bald face lie.

    Check the link... it has the UNEP seal of approval.




    You can say TNVolunteer73, Curse you, you foiled me again.
    If only you could learn to read.
    Thanks from RNG

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. ...So Will THIS Building Collapse Into Its Own Footprint?
    By grinder in forum Conspiracy Theories
    Replies: 403
    Last Post: 5th June 2016, 03:51 PM
  2. Earth Day concert leaves quite a footprint on National Mall
    By meridian5455 in forum Current Events
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 20th April 2015, 09:43 AM
  3. Replies: 169
    Last Post: 8th October 2014, 10:46 AM
  4. Replies: 144
    Last Post: 29th August 2012, 05:46 PM
  5. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 23rd August 2007, 08:04 PM

Tags for this Thread


Facebook Twitter RSS Feed