Page 4 of 8 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 77
Thanks Tree26Thanks

Thread: Climate change is ‘not as bad as we thought’ say scientists

  1. #31
    Banned Camp
    Joined
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    66,423
    Thanks
    4302

    Quote Originally Posted by BigLeRoy View Post
    No. I am saying the world appears to be warming up MUCH more rapidly than we had been expecting. Which means that RAPID climate change may possibly be RIGHT AROUND THE CORNER. The planet Earth may be right on the VERGE of a quite sudden shift into an entirely different climate regime, with totally rearranged ocean currents, and with the jet stream on an altogether new path. Expect mega-droughts to begin in some areas, such as the American Southwest and Great Plains, and possibly across North Africa and into the Middle East. A prolonged drought contributed to the civil war and crisis in Syria, and manmade climate change is implicated in that. Other areas might see intense flooding and massive increases in precipitation. Areas such as New England might see snowfalls such as no modern human has ever seen. The Gulf Stream might shut down, plunging the British Isles and Scandinavia into a Deep Freeze. The Indian Monsoon, which brings life-giving rains to the Indian Sub-Continent, might divert to a different track.

    We do know this: Spaceship Earth is in trouble.
    In your dreams anyway

  2. #32
    One
    One is offline
    10 Year Survivor One's Avatar
    Joined
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    9,749
    Thanks
    7253

    From
    ----> X <----
    Quote Originally Posted by DebateDrone View Post
    Why would you believe one study over another?

    If science is incapable to correctly gauge the situation, then why would more science be any more correct?

    If Science is bunk...then all science is bunk.

    If you claim some science is good and other science is bad...then what is your criteria in choosing good science over bad?

    Seems to me you are choosing science based on which science you LIKE.
    politics over planet.
    Thanks from Dangermouse

  3. #33
    Radical Centrist BigLeRoy's Avatar
    Joined
    Jan 2016
    Posts
    30,965
    Thanks
    26139

    From
    Colorado
    Quote Originally Posted by ptif219 View Post
    In your dreams anyway
    We are altering the composition of the Earth's atmosphere.

    That doesn't strike you as a rather dangerous science experiment?
    Thanks from Friday13 and Dangermouse

  4. #34
    One
    One is offline
    10 Year Survivor One's Avatar
    Joined
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    9,749
    Thanks
    7253

    From
    ----> X <----
    Quote Originally Posted by BigLeRoy View Post
    We are altering the composition of the Earth's atmosphere.

    That doesn't strike you as a rather dangerous science experiment?
    But we gotta make that profit for the elite few. Nothing else matters.

  5. #35
    Wrinkly Member Dangermouse's Avatar
    Joined
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    24,210
    Thanks
    22819

    From
    Sunny Bournemouth, Dorset
    Quote Originally Posted by ptif219 View Post
    In your dreams anyway
    You don't think Earth is a life-sustaining capsule that floats in space?

  6. #36
    Banned Camp
    Joined
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    66,423
    Thanks
    4302

    Quote Originally Posted by BigLeRoy View Post
    We are altering the composition of the Earth's atmosphere.

    That doesn't strike you as a rather dangerous science experiment?
    You are looking at the wrong things. Carbon is a very small part of the atmosphere

  7. #37
    Banned Camp
    Joined
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    66,423
    Thanks
    4302

    Quote Originally Posted by One View Post
    But we gotta make that profit for the elite few. Nothing else matters.

    Yet you want the profit for the liberal green companies that cost more than they do

  8. #38
    Banned Camp
    Joined
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    66,423
    Thanks
    4302

    Quote Originally Posted by Dangermouse View Post
    You don't think Earth is a life-sustaining capsule that floats in space?

    I think the liberals are perverting natural climate change and falsely blaming man for it

  9. #39
    Radical Centrist BigLeRoy's Avatar
    Joined
    Jan 2016
    Posts
    30,965
    Thanks
    26139

    From
    Colorado
    Quote Originally Posted by ptif219 View Post
    You are looking at the wrong things. Carbon is a very small part of the atmosphere
    True, but rather irrelevant. CO2.....and CH4 (methane) can still have a very large impact on the Earth's climate, because they are greenhouse gases. I'm not sure you understand the basic idea.

    Look, a compound like phosphine or arsine would have to be present in only parts per BILLION in your immediate vicinity.....and you'd be DEAD.

    So you need to put on your thinking cap here, and do a bit more thinking.

  10. #40
    Banned Camp
    Joined
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    66,423
    Thanks
    4302

    Quote Originally Posted by BigLeRoy View Post
    True, but rather irrelevant. CO2.....and CH4 (methane) can still have a very large impact on the Earth's climate, because they are greenhouse gases. I'm not sure you understand the basic idea.

    Look, a compound like phosphine or arsine would have to be present in only parts per BILLION in your immediate vicinity.....and you'd be DEAD.

    So you need to put on your thinking cap here, and do a bit more thinking.
    In the eyes of those that believe the false models

Page 4 of 8 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 91
    Last Post: 23rd January 2018, 10:36 PM
  2. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 21st June 2015, 09:21 PM
  3. Replies: 28
    Last Post: 27th February 2014, 03:27 PM
  4. Scientists: Pace of Climate Change Exceeds Estimates
    By bluesman in forum Political Discussion
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 17th February 2009, 05:15 AM
  5. Scientists doubt climate change
    By Freedom for All in forum Political Discussion
    Replies: 186
    Last Post: 7th January 2008, 06:14 AM

Tags for this Thread


Facebook Twitter RSS Feed