Thread: Why Liberals Are More Intelligent Than Conservatives

Originally Posted by Gypsy

Common sense is subjective isn't it?

And in terribly short supply............

Originally Posted by angryamerican

I always suspected our far right members had lower IQ's or else they would be Liberals.

Psychology Today has proven it.

Why Liberals Are More Intelligent Than Conservatives | Psychology Today

those who identify themselves as “very liberal” in early adulthood have a mean childhood IQ of 106.4, whereas those who identify themselves as “very conservative” in early adulthood have a mean childhood IQ of 94.8.

Would just like to point out that half or more of all liberals are women.

And numerous studies have concluded that 50% of all chicks have below average intelligence.


So put that in the ol' pipe and smoke it, fella....





.

Originally Posted by pragmatic

Would just like to point out that half or more of all liberals are women.

And numerous studies have concluded that 50% of all chicks have below average intelligence.


So put that in the ol' pipe and smoke it, fella....





.

That should set a few people off.

And women got the right to vote in 1920. Nine years later then Great Depression occurred. Coincidence? I think not!

Originally Posted by angryamerican

I always suspected our far right members had lower IQ's or else they would be Liberals.

Psychology Today has proven it.

Why Liberals Are More Intelligent Than Conservatives | Psychology Today







those who identify themselves as “very liberal” in early adulthood have a mean childhood IQ of 106.4, whereas those who identify themselves as “very conservative” in early adulthood have a mean childhood IQ of 94.8.

***Yawn***

If this is "smart"

Science Report Cites Possibility of Pre-Emptive Strike at Earth by Aliens


Well. lol

Originally Posted by Gypsy

Common sense is subjective isn't it?

So is intelligence. Well, maybe not subjective, but it has a lot of variations. Emotional intelligence, technical, strategic, academic, numerical, situational awareness, relational, influential and many more. The idea that there is one intelligence reservoir that can power all these forms of action is flawed. In evaluating candidates for positions, you often have to find complementary forms of intelligence to make a fit. The big picture strategist at a CEO level often needs a more technically and execution oriented right hand person. But if you are at the head of a research lab, you might need supplementary abilities more, someone who is like the head, but has a different knowledge base.