Another rebranding for climate change, be very afraid.

[CtC]

No thanks, i'm not thirsty.

It can be used for energy. What a knuckle head answer.

 

[highway234]

It can be used for energy. What a knuckle head answer.

Yes, for solving the climate change/fossil fuel depletion dilemma, hydrogen peroxide is indeed a knucklehead answer. But it's not like I had high expectations.

 

[highway234]

Find an opinion from a credible source. If you cant, then that says a lot.

(I actually go out of my way to avoid posting from sources like Vox, or common dreams)

Mmm hmm. Just say the word and I'll get Truthdiggy all up in this. But nobody wants that!

 

[Gooseberrymesa]

Not every prediction; just the one's that could possibly have an extremely negative outcome to human's down the road. Better to be safe then sorry.

So the bigger the lie the more you should react to it? That's a recipe for disaster.

 

[Gooseberrymesa]

Find an opinion from a credible source. If you cant, then that says a lot.

(I actually go out of my way to avoid posting from sources like Vox, or common dreams)

And who is judge and jury as to the credibility of the source? You?

 

[Dangermouse]

And who is judge and jury as to the credibility of the source? You?

Not you.

 

[Djinn]

Apparently he heads this alarmist PR group which is likely a division of Media Matters.

I don't think that "Aaron Hall" has any more authority to speak on the subject of climate change than you or me.

 

[Gooseberrymesa]

I don't think that "Aaron Hall" has any more authority to speak on the subject of climate change than you or me.

Obviously not and he is just a cog in the machine attempting to rebrand the AGW hypothesis once again as alarmist look to gain traction. I can only wonder how many times they can pull this trick until everyone just rolls their eyes.

 

[gamewell45]

So the bigger the lie the more you should react to it? That's a recipe for disaster.

How do you know it's a lie? Unless you are one of the scientists that has experience in this area, what qualifies you (aside from the first amendment) to make a statement like that?

 

[Djinn]

Obviously not and he is just a cog in the machine attempting to rebrand the AGW hypothesis once again as alarmist look to gain traction. I can only wonder how many times they can pull this trick until everyone just rolls their eyes.

This one isn't backed by the scientific community; it's a lone individual with no experience in the field. It will not gain traction.