Anti-DefamationLeague confirms: Trump wrestling video was made by an avowed Jew hater

Singularity

Former Staff
Oct 2009
33,046
27,396
Kansas
#31
So? Are you saying Trump wants to do all that just because this guy shot a 30 second video of Trump?
Let me try to walk you through it one more time: It's not about Trump, it's about the taxpayer-funded staffer who found the video and used taxpayer-funded resources to recirculate it, and thus the obviously illegitimate and hateful creator. Trump's only connection is his refusal, to date, to hold that person to account.
 
Sep 2014
56,061
11,612
United States
#32
Let me try to walk you through it one more time: It's not about Trump, it's about the taxpayer-funded staffer who found the video and used taxpayer-funded resources to recirculate it, and thus the obviously illegitimate and hateful creator. Trump's only connection is his refusal, to date, to hold that person to account.
So you are against free speech. Got it.
 

Singularity

Former Staff
Oct 2009
33,046
27,396
Kansas
#33
So you are against free speech. Got it.
Free speech doesn't cover taxpayer-funded White House staffers acting in their official capacity, and he's not even speaking for himself, he used the official presidential account which is likely backed up on a server we all paid for.

This isn't that hard to understand. Any of Trump's predecessors would've fired this guy instantly.
 

Singularity

Former Staff
Oct 2009
33,046
27,396
Kansas
#35
Free speech doesn't cover taxpayer-funded White House staffers acting in their official capacity, and he's not even speaking for himself, he used the official presidential account which is likely backed up on a server we all paid for.

This isn't that hard to understand. Any of Trump's predecessors would've fired this guy instantly.
Next interview with Reince Priebus, first one should be:

Q. Is it not within your purview as Chief of Staff to discipline, up to and including the termination of, White House staffers who use public resources to promote people who clearly don't deserve it?

Betcha he wouldn't answer. "Well, we're focused on the issues..."
 
Sep 2014
56,061
11,612
United States
#36
Free speech doesn't cover taxpayer-funded White House staffers acting in their official capacity, and he's not even speaking for himself, he used the official presidential account which is likely backed up on a server we all paid for.

This isn't that hard to understand. Any of Trump's predecessors would've fired this guy instantly.
Where in the Constitution does it exampt gov employees from the First Amendment?
 

webrockk

Former Staff
Nov 2009
30,474
11,090
on the river
#38
Next interview with Reince Priebus, first one should be:

Q. Is it not within your purview as Chief of Staff to discipline, up to and including the termination of, White House staffers who use public resources to promote people who clearly don't deserve it?

Betcha he wouldn't answer. "Well, we're focused on the issues..."
What undeserving person is being promoted by that silly video?
 

Similar Discussions