Dershowitz DefendingTrump's Civil Liberties

Jan 2015
41,021
10,786
Great State of Texas
#41
Hillary was spared indictments because Comey, McCabe, Lynch, others conspired to not indict her, before the facts were in. Predetermined she will walk as she is the next president.

THere is your case of obstruction.
And, collusion too
 
Jan 2007
32,834
6,837
#42
He writes a book defending Trump and then has a fit when someone points out he is defending Trump, LOL. Trump and his supporters are soo toxic not even the people that are defending him want people to think they are Trumpsters too.
Alan is standing up on the merits of the law and apparently Trump fits within it, despite your wishes.
 
Sep 2016
19,390
13,442
My own world
#43
Hillary was spared indictments because Comey, McCabe, Lynch, others conspired to not indict her, before the facts were in. Predetermined she will walk as she is the next president.

THere is your case of obstruction.
Bullshit, there is zero reason then that the GOP led FBI and DOJ haven’t charged her now after almost two years. They have had control of EVERYTHING ! What fucking more could the GOP want if she were truly guilty of something? Pfft !
 
Jan 2015
41,021
10,786
Great State of Texas
#44
Alan is standing up on the merits of the law and apparently Trump fits within it, despite your wishes.
And, Dershowitz has clarrified that fact numerous times but, that doesn't stop the fake news MSM from smearing him for pointing out Mueller and Co.'s unConstitutional BS.
 
Sep 2016
19,390
13,442
My own world
#46
Alan is standing up on the merits of the law and apparently Trump fits within it, despite your wishes.
HA HA, if it doesn’t fit you must acquit !! Alan figured out the GOP is full of RUBES and RUBES and their money are soon parted.
 
Jan 2015
41,021
10,786
Great State of Texas
#47
Bullshit, there is zero reason then that the GOP led FBI and DOJ haven’t charged her now after almost two years. They have had control of EVERYTHING ! What fucking more could the GOP want if she were truly guilty of something? Pfft !
There is ample evidence of HRC's crimes and the fact that the FBI and the DOJ conspired to NOT hold her accountable.

Just because you refuse to acknowledge it doesn't make it not exist.
 
Jan 2007
32,834
6,837
#48
He's only interested in selling his book. He must be hard up for cash. I doubt that teaching is providing enough income for the lifestyle to which he has become accustomed.
Lots of books are being written by lots of political people. Look how many hillary books are out.
 
Sep 2016
19,390
13,442
My own world
#49
And, Dershowitz has clarrified that fact numerous times but, that doesn't stop the fake news MSM from smearing him for pointing out Mueller and Co.'s unConstitutional BS.
Only the Supreme Court has already ruled the President isn’t above the law.

https://www.lawfareblog.com/view-supreme-court-alan-dershowitz-wrong-about-powers-president

Alan Dershowitz, in a series of recent op-eds, has taken to arguing in his characteristic take-no-prisoners style that the whole issue of whether President Trump might have obstructed justice is a red herring. Even if the President ordered James Comey to shut down the Flynn investigation and had a corrupt intent for doing so, this would still not amount to the crime of obstruction of justice. The reason, according to Dershowitz, is that the Constitution gives the exclusive power to the President to control all federal law-enforcement investigations—and thus to shut any of them down for any reason the President sees fit. In other words, the President can never commit obstruction of justice by shutting down a criminal investigation or prosecution.

But Dershowitz fails to take into account that the Supreme Court has decisively rejected this view. In Morrison v. Olson (1988), a 7-1 Supreme Court turned back constitutional challenges to Congress’ creation of the Act that gave us the office of the Independent Counsel—and in doing so, dismissed exactly the argument that Dershowitz now seeks to invoke.
 
Likes: 1 person