DOJ Admits FBI Never Saw Crowdstrike Report on DNC Russian Hacking Claim…

Dec 2014
17,050
6,132
The Milky Way
#1
Laughable if it were not so serious.

So that sure was some investigation into this entire matter, eh. And thus Crowdstrike's allegation that Russia did it has never been proven. But Robert 'Anthrax' Mueller also went with this unproven story in his report.


The foundation for the Russian election interference narrative is built on the claim of Russians hacking the servers of the Democrat National Committee (DNC), and subsequently releasing damaging emails that showed the DNC worked to help Hillary Clinton and eliminate Bernie Sanders.

Despite the Russian ‘hacking’ claim the DOJ previously admitted the DNC would not let FBI investigators review the DNC server. Instead the DNC provided the FBI with analysis of a technical review done through a cyber-security contract with Crowdstrike.

The narrative around the DNC hack claim was always sketchy; many people believe the DNC email data was downloaded onto a flash drive and leaked. In a court filing (full pdf below) the scale of sketchy has increased exponentially.


Suspecting they could prove the Russian hacking claim was false, lawyers representing Roger Stone requested the full Crowdstrike report on the DNC hack. When the DOJ responded to the Stone motion they made a rather significant admission. Not only did the FBI not review the DNC server, the FBI/DOJ never even saw the Crowdstrike report.





Yes, that is correct. The FBI and DOJ were only allowed to see a “draft” report prepared by Crowdstrike, and that report was redacted… and that redacted draft is the “last version of the report produced”; meaning, there are no unredacted & final versions.

...



DOJ Admits FBI Never Saw Crowdstrike Report on DNC Russian Hacking Claim…
 
Likes: all9Yards
Dec 2014
17,050
6,132
The Milky Way
#3

"This means the FBI and DOJ, and all of the downstream claims by the intelligence apparatus; including the December 2016 Joint Analysis Report and January 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment, all the way to the Weissmann/Mueller report and the continued claims therein; were based on the official intelligence agencies of the U.S. government and the U.S. Department of Justice taking the word of a hired contractor for the Democrat party….. despite their inability to examine the server and/or actually see an unredacted technical forensic report from the investigating contractor."


The entire apparatus of the U.S. government just took their word for it…
…and used the claim therein as an official position….
…which led to a subsequent government claim, in court, of absolute certainty that Russia hacked the DNC.
Think about that for a few minutes. -Conservative Treehouse

Meanwhile, the Crowdstrike analyst who led forensics on the DNC servers is a former FBI employee who Robert Mueller promoted while head of the agency. It should also be noted that the government of Ukraine admonished Crowdstrike for a report they later retracted and amended, claiming that Russia hacked Ukrainian military.


In connection with the emergence in some media reports which stated that the alleged “80% howitzer D-30 Armed Forces of Ukraine removed through scrapping Russian Ukrainian hackers software gunners,” Land Forces Command of the Armed Forces of Ukraine informs that the said information is incorrect.
Ministry of Defence of Ukraine asks journalists to publish only verified information received from the competent official sources. Spreading false information leads to increased social tension in society and undermines public confidence in the Armed Forces of Ukraine. –mil.gov.ua (translated) (1.6.2017)

Amazing...​


US Govt's Entire Russia-DNC Hacking Narrative Based On Redacted Draft Of Crowdstrike Report
 
Likes: John T Ford
Mar 2019
3,285
1,687
"US" of A
#4
Laughable if it were not so serious.

So that sure was some investigation into this entire matter, eh. And thus Crowdstrike's allegation that Russia did it has never been proven. But Robert 'Anthrax' Mueller also went with this unproven story in his report.


The foundation for the Russian election interference narrative is built on the claim of Russians hacking the servers of the Democrat National Committee (DNC), and subsequently releasing damaging emails that showed the DNC worked to help Hillary Clinton and eliminate Bernie Sanders.​
Despite the Russian ‘hacking’ claim the DOJ previously admitted the DNC would not let FBI investigators review the DNC server. Instead the DNC provided the FBI with analysis of a technical review done through a cyber-security contract with Crowdstrike.​
The narrative around the DNC hack claim was always sketchy; many people believe the DNC email data was downloaded onto a flash drive and leaked. In a court filing (full pdf below) the scale of sketchy has increased exponentially.​
Suspecting they could prove the Russian hacking claim was false, lawyers representing Roger Stone requested the full Crowdstrike report on the DNC hack. When the DOJ responded to the Stone motion they made a rather significant admission. Not only did the FBI not review the DNC server, the FBI/DOJ never even saw the Crowdstrike report.​



Yes, that is correct. The FBI and DOJ were only allowed to see a “draft” report prepared by Crowdstrike, and that report was redacted… and that redacted draft is the “last version of the report produced”; meaning, there are no unredacted & final versions.​
...​


DOJ Admits FBI Never Saw Crowdstrike Report on DNC Russian Hacking Claim…
Distraction, spectacle and illusion to infinity. Nothing will happen, BUT, serious societal discussion can be avoided.
 
Jan 2015
50,165
14,634
Great State of Texas
#5
It's because the information that was given to Julian Assange was not hacked by the Russians.

It was downloaded by a disgruntled Bernie supporting DNC employee.

The DNC could not afford for the FBI to be looking around that event and we all know why.
 
Jan 2019
6,753
2,493
southeast
#7
It's because the information that was given to Julian Assange was not hacked by the Russians.

It was downloaded by a disgruntled Bernie supporting DNC employee.

The DNC could not afford for the FBI to be looking around that event and we all know why.
I have often wondered about all this. And to think the FBI never did get to see the DNC servers. Something stinks and it smells fishy.
 
Jan 2015
50,165
14,634
Great State of Texas
#8
I have often wondered about all this. And to think the FBI never did get to see the DNC servers. Something stinks and it smells fishy.
The FBI was covering for Hillary.

The DNC could have afforded for the FBI to have investigated the servers.

That would have lead them straight to Seth Rich.
 
Apr 2019
3,442
1,181
Southeast
#9
Talk about obstruction, any on the left care to explain why the DNC did not want the FBI seeing it's server? What were the filthy vermin trying to cover up?
 

Similar Discussions