- Mar 2019
If so,then he should never have been appointed. There was no interference. No voting machines tampered with. No Ballots fixed. No "Russians" sneaking in here to vote. Putting out a few Facebook adds is NOT interference. And Trump had no part of even that.There is no statutory crime called "COLLUSION" and only Trump, his shills and trolls have made the claim there was "no collusion". They aren't lying in one sense, but they also are NOT telling the whole truth. One can't commit a crime that is NOT a crime. In addition, Trump was NOT exonerated on the potential charge of "obstruction of justice" which would be a statutory crime. Moreover, Mueller said that based on a long standing DoJ policy the DoJ cannot indict a sitting President and made it clear that there is only one body that can do that when it comes to what would be similar to an "indictment" of the POTUS. Presidents can be indicted by states for the breaking of state laws, but when it comes to actions taken while in office that are unfitting of that office or break statutory federal law, the only avenue is impeachment. The House Democrats have taken up that responsibility, as is their duty and according to the oath of office they and all elected, appointed or hired people of the federal goverment, take, including the POTUS.
What remains to be seen is whether the republican majority in the Senate will choose to act in political partisan ways, showing higher loyalty to their political party than to the Constitution of the U.S.A. or will they behave as those who took an oath to uphold and defend the Constitution against all enemies foreign AND domestic.
If they choose to be partisan, I am unsure of how they are going to defend the man you see and hear talking in the following tapes and they are older videos. He has accumulated a lot more of the same (all in the public record) since.