How come Republican Congress members don't have any problem peddling Russian propaganda?

Nov 2019
369
69
United States
Apparently not to you.
And especially to Adam Schitt and his alt-left sheep. You probably still believe he has evidence of collusion that somehow Mueller and his 19 Trump hating Democrats couldn't find and still believe his version of the phone call with Zelensky was real for chrissakes. The man should be in prison.
 
Apr 2012
62,164
47,853
Englewood,Ohio
Honorable men don't go on TV for 2 year straight and tell the American people they've got hard evidence of the POTUS committing crimes with Russia knowing full well the entire time he was lying through his rotted out teeth. Honorable men don't make up phony versions of a phone call with nothing incriminating in it to make it appear as if the POTUS was committing crimes. Honorable men don't collude with alt-lefties to frame the President (like the whistleblower) and lie about it.

Facts matter.
If you have it you do!

You trying to pretend Trump is an honorable man in your posts? If so they are failing miserably Here. Ask Marvin.
 
Nov 2019
369
69
United States
If you have it you do!

You trying to pretend Trump is an honorable man in your posts? If so they are failing miserably Here. Ask Marvin.
Stop try to deflect Adam Schitt's hideous track record. The fact you can't defend it tells us all we need to know.
 

the watchman

Former Staff
Jul 2011
94,625
62,001
becoming more and more
Left wing conspiracy. This is how your ilk work. Make up phony allegations against those taking you down. You tried that with Nunes before when Dems tried to complain to the House ethics committee about him. Eventually the ethics committee tossed the allegation as meritless. Yet, here you are still clinging to nonsense like that. Pathetic.
WTF are you babbling about? The Ethics Committee did no such thing. They conducted an inquiry with classification expert and determined that the information was not classified. They did their job. That doesn't mean that the allegations were "phony". Nor does it have anything to do with the current ethics inquiry. The only thing that's "pathetic" here is your bs argument.
 

the watchman

Former Staff
Jul 2011
94,625
62,001
becoming more and more
Stop try to deflect Adam Schitt's hideous track record. The fact you can't defend it tells us all we need to know.
when did Clinton get to question the people Ken Starr was interviewing?
 

the watchman

Former Staff
Jul 2011
94,625
62,001
becoming more and more
How many times are we going to see this dance? There was the 2016 election. The recounts. The attempt to swing the Electoral College. Then it was Russia. Now it’s Ukraine.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
what do any of these have to do with each other?
 

the watchman

Former Staff
Jul 2011
94,625
62,001
becoming more and more
Glad you asked... They are all failed attempts by the Democrats to remove an elected president.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
bullshit. They are all right wing fringe talking points. Attempts to change the electoral college never happened. Trump was the one that was calling his own election into question. The "Russia investigation" was led by Republican's. Dems are leading impeachment in the House. But , they know full well that he's likely not going to be removed from office. That's why you're already able to call it a "failed" attempt.
 

CtC

Mar 2019
12,647
4,516
California
bullshit. They are all right wing fringe talking points. Attempts to change the electoral college never happened. Trump was the one that was calling his own election into question. The "Russia investigation" was led by Republican's. Dems are leading impeachment in the House. But , they know full well that he's likely not going to be removed from office. That's why you're already able to call it a "failed" attempt.
Obviously it is a failure if they fail to remove him. Just proves Dem politicos are stuck on stupid.