- Dec 2014
Articles have been written explaining how the fact-checkers get it wrong.
Had you bothered to read the link I posted, you would see a few examples.
I did read it Mr. Snark and the claims are mere assertions. Had they taken the fact checker model, they would have supplied source material to confirm the assertions and in addition, the examples supplied weren't all that consequential. To address the bias on a similar level as a fact checker would have been more convincing to those who know how this works, however, they chose a more prosaic route in order to appeal to emotion. Furthermore, exploring the author's articles evinces extreme bias, so the irony isn't lost on me there either.