'Impartial' fact-checkers are revealing their partisanship against Trump

Dec 2014
13,019
10,466
Opal mining
#41
Articles have been written explaining how the fact-checkers get it wrong.
So those with a vested interest claim and it is usually inconsequential. Guess what? No one said they were perfect. LOL

Had you bothered to read the link I posted, you would see a few examples.

I did read it Mr. Snark and the claims are mere assertions. Had they taken the fact checker model, they would have supplied source material to confirm the assertions and in addition, the examples supplied weren't all that consequential. To address the bias on a similar level as a fact checker would have been more convincing to those who know how this works, however, they chose a more prosaic route in order to appeal to emotion. Furthermore, exploring the author's articles evinces extreme bias, so the irony isn't lost on me there either.
 
Last edited:

HayJenn

Moderator
Jul 2014
62,055
50,305
CA
#42
Nobody is denying facts based on hard numbers and Fact Checker sites are not based on hard numbers either.

Honestly at this point only Sheeple believe Fact Checker sites.

You know .... the same ones watching CNN and MSNBC.
The irony - of someone who obviously does not believe in facts.
 
Jul 2013
51,112
54,261
Nashville, TN
#44
There may be no such thing as Trump Kryptonite, although I'd say ideology and the left right back and forth shit ranks pretty high on the charts. Trump tells NOTHING but facts, and they are all backed up.

Once again, you hate him because he ISN'T a swamp rat. He's the first real president in a generation who was actually qualified for the office and not some incompetent politician getting the job either out of family ties or skin tone. And he has been the best president of all.

Jobs are up. The economy is soaring, much better than during the reigns of the last four knuckleheads who held the job.
8755012.jpg
 
Nov 2018
4,536
1,154
Bel Air, MD
#45
The leftists who follow fact-checkers are Trump haters, and they are useful idiots. They believe what these fact-checkers tell them because of their own bias against the President. They've become a sick-minded, deprived of oxygen lot, Democrat boot-lickers, who have put Party over country, which is why they support idiots like AOC, who will continue to drag them further left.



Who Is Fact Checking The Media Fact Checkers?
In July, for example, a quarter of the Post's "fact" checks were of opinions, as were 18% of Politifact's. It also looks at how often fact checkers rely on other news outlets to verify claims.
https://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/fact-checkers-big-media/
 

HayJenn

Moderator
Jul 2014
62,055
50,305
CA
#46
Yes, any fake news journalist would call them substandard, while they continue to feed their followers more crapola.

Upset? lol Now that is funny!
Actually noted the "author" of this lousy piece works for The Federalist.

Talk about obvious bias.
 
Likes: Babba

HayJenn

Moderator
Jul 2014
62,055
50,305
CA
#47
The leftists who follow fact-checkers are Trump haters, and they are useful idiots. They believe what these fact-checkers tell them because of their own bias against the President. They've become a sick-minded, deprived of oxygen lot, Democrat boot-lickers, who have put Party over country, which is why they support idiots like AOC, who will continue to drag them further left.



Who Is Fact Checking The Media Fact Checkers?
In July, for example, a quarter of the Post's "fact" checks were of opinions, as were 18% of Politifact's. It also looks at how often fact checkers rely on other news outlets to verify claims.
https://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/fact-checkers-big-media/
And yet another completely biased source

What it with you that you only post "sources" that again, agree with your bias?

Why do you not ever use say, AP or Reuters for example?
 
Nov 2018
4,536
1,154
Bel Air, MD
#49
So those with a vested interest claim and it is usually inconsequential. Guess what? No one said they were perfect. LOL




I did read it Mr. Snark and the claims are mere assertions. Had they taken the fact checker model, they would have supplied source material to confirm the assertions. That would have been more convincing to those who know how this works, however, they chose a more prosaic route to appeal to emotion.
The article provided examples, not assertions. It's too bad that leftists now can't even seem to recognize they are being duped by the fake news sources.

Fact-checkers, who the left rely on to bash Trump and conservatives, ought to be accurate, but unfortunately, their hate comes out and any thinking American can see them for what they are --- a biased left-wingnut source for left-wingnuts.