Is Mueller's Russian conclusion a lie?

Is Mueller's Russian conclusion a lie?

  • Yes

  • No


Results are only viewable after voting.
Nov 2015
7,205
2,440
UK
#1
It's a very simple question. Mueller investigated for 22 months and concluded, there was no Russian Collusion with the Trump campaign. Did Mueller lie, is his conclusion a lie? If you say, "No he was wrong", that's code talk for, "Yes he lied".

With all the conspiracy theories (and very humourous I may might add) that are going on in other threads, do you believe Mueller's conclusion is a lie?

If you choose "Yes", could you point out the evidence that Mueller missed.
 

HayJenn

Moderator
Jul 2014
70,245
60,283
CA
#2
It's a very simple question. Mueller investigated for 22 months and concluded, there was no Russian Collusion with the Trump campaign. Did Mueller lie, is his conclusion a lie? If you say, "No he was wrong", that's code talk for, "Yes he lied".

With all the conspiracy theories (and very humourous I may might add) that are going on in other threads, do you believe Mueller's conclusion is a lie?

If you choose "Yes", could you point out the evidence that Mueller missed.
He said there was not enough evidence to charge him with "conspiracy" - although many in his administration "welcomed" their "help". I guess you didn't bother to actually read Mueller's report?

Again, Flynn is going to jail
 
Jul 2013
56,993
62,495
Nashville, TN
#3
Mueller did not conclude that, he just didn’t have enough evidence to convict , too much of it had been destroyed
 
Oct 2018
5,008
6,869
Somewhere they can't find me.
#4
He said there was not enough evidence to charge him with "conspiracy" - although many in his administration "welcomed" their "help". I guess you didn't bother to actually read Mueller's report?

Again, Flynn is going to jail

Manafort too.

And Stone will soon be joining them.
 
Likes: HayJenn

the watchman

Former Staff
Jul 2011
93,121
59,324
becoming more and more
#5
As an initial matter, this Office evaluated potentially criminal conduct that involved the collective action of multiple individuals not under the rubric of “collusion,” but through the lens of conspiracy law. In so doing, the Office recognized that the word “collud[e]” appears in the Acting Attorney General’s August 2, 2017 memorandum; it has frequently been invoked in public reporting; and it is sometimes referenced in antitrust law, see, e.g., Brooke Group v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 509 U.S. 209, 227 (1993). But collusion is not a specific offense or theory of liability found in the U.S. Code; nor is it a term of art in federal criminal law. To the contrary, even as defined in legal dictionaries, collusion is largely synonymous with conspiracy as that crime is set forth in the general federal conspiracy statute, 18 U.S.C. §371. See Black’s Law Dictionary 321 (10th ed. 2014) (collusion is “[a]n agreement to defraud another or to do or obtain something forbidden by law"); 1 Alexander Burrill, A Law Dictionary and Glossary 311 (1871) (“An agreement between two or more persons to defraud another by the forms of law, or to employ such forms as means of accomplishing some unlawful object."); 1 Bouvier’s Law Dictionary 352(1897) (“An agreement between two or more persons to defraud a person of his rights by the forms of law, or to obtain an object forbidden by law.").

For that reason, this Office’s focus in resolving the question of joint criminal liability was on conspiracy as defined in federal law, not the commonly discussed term “collusion.”
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/04/18/us/politics/mueller-report-document.html
 
Jul 2013
56,993
62,495
Nashville, TN
#8
I can only conclude that Mueller wrote the report in a special ink that only the left can see. The amount of crap you guys come out with, it's not visible to the rest of the planet.
Try reading a BBC summary of the report instead of taking the word of #Trumpcult
 
Jul 2013
56,993
62,495
Nashville, TN
#9
37 “I don’t remember” answers from Trump on his Mueller questioning leaves a lot of unanswered questions, does it not?