Let us be honest. Islam’s ideology is immoral to its core. Should we ask the Haigue a

Sep 2013
2,181
192
Canada
#1
Let us be honest. Islam’s ideology is immoral to its core. Should we ask the Haigue and U.N. to rule on the free world's first duty to the world. Should we declare war against this immoral ideology?

Our collective leadership must lead by honor. Honor demands the first duty of all free people be to do their best to ensure that all the people of the world enjoy the same level of freedom that they enjoy. This is irrefutable, in terms of morality.

Freedom can only be enjoyed in a moral society.

The Hague and U.N. must rule on the duty of the free world to humanity, and decide if it is better to have all these little wars that disrupt our cities and countries, or declare a real ideological war against the barbaric and non-progressive ideology that the Eastern hordes are trying to force down the Wests throat.

As usual, religions are trying to grow themselves by the sword. A redirection is in order and quite necessary if peace is to be achieved.

We, the collective of the free world, must move the war to one of words that judge the ideologies for their moral worth, and seek to live by the best one. That verdict will determine the will of the free world as to which direction we free people wish the world to evolve to; in terms of the limits of freedom and the duty of free people.

The free world has forgotten that its first duty to the world is to work to have the whole world share in that freedom.

A war of words tends to kill fewer people than the murderous religious insurgencies we now suffer.

I think our legislators ought to consider such a strategy.

Do you?

Regards
DL
 
Last edited:

Djinn

Council Hall
Dec 2007
51,069
37,591
Pennsylvania, USA
#2
My daughter just held a joint-birthday party at our home with her best friend, a Muslim. They invited about 30 people; around 22-24 teenagers showed up. Everyone had a great time.

When the friend's parents arrived at the end of the evening to pick her up, they thanked us effusively for allowing the party to take place at our house. I forgot to tell them that their religion's ideology is immoral to the core. Should I call them, or write them a letter?
 
Likes: 6 people
Jul 2011
78,396
44,061
Memphis, Tn.
#3
Let us be honest. Islam’s ideology is immoral to its core. Should we ask the Haigue and U.N. to rule on the free world first duty to the world. Should we declare war against this immoral ideology?

Our collective leadership must lead by honor. Honor demands the first duty of all free people be to do their best to ensure that all the people of the world enjoy the same level of freedom that they enjoy. This is irrefutable, in terms of morality.

Freedom can only be enjoyed in a moral society.

The Hague and U.N. must rule on the duty of the free world to humanity, and decide if it is better to have all these little wars that disrupt our cities and countries, or declare a real ideological war against the barbaric and non-progressive ideology that the Eastern hordes are trying to force down the Wests throat.

As usual, religions are trying to grow themselves by the sword. A redirection is in order and quite necessary if peace is to be achieved.

We, the collective of the free world, must move the war to one of words that judge the ideologies for their moral worth, and seek to live by the best one. That verdict will determine the will of the free world as to which direction we free people wish the world to evolve to; in terms of the limits of freedom and the duty of free people.

The free world has forgotten that its first duty to the world is to work to have the whole world share in that freedom.

A war of words tends to kill fewer people than the murderous religious insurgencies we now suffer.

I think our legislators ought to consider such a strategy.

Do you?

Regards
DL
So, don't convert to Islam. *shrug*
 
Likes: 2 people
Nov 2006
54,523
20,427
#5
Let us be honest. Islam’s ideology is immoral to its core. Should we ask the Haigue and U.N. to rule on the free world first duty to the world. Should we declare war against this immoral ideology?

Our collective leadership must lead by honor. Honor demands the first duty of all free people be to do their best to ensure that all the people of the world enjoy the same level of freedom that they enjoy. This is irrefutable, in terms of morality.

Freedom can only be enjoyed in a moral society.

The Hague and U.N. must rule on the duty of the free world to humanity, and decide if it is better to have all these little wars that disrupt our cities and countries, or declare a real ideological war against the barbaric and non-progressive ideology that the Eastern hordes are trying to force down the Wests throat.

As usual, religions are trying to grow themselves by the sword. A redirection is in order and quite necessary if peace is to be achieved.

We, the collective of the free world, must move the war to one of words that judge the ideologies for their moral worth, and seek to live by the best one. That verdict will determine the will of the free world as to which direction we free people wish the world to evolve to; in terms of the limits of freedom and the duty of free people.

The free world has forgotten that its first duty to the world is to work to have the whole world share in that freedom.

A war of words tends to kill fewer people than the murderous religious insurgencies we now suffer.

I think our legislators ought to consider such a strategy.

Do you?

Regards
DL
Boy is that fucking ignorant. 99% of muslims in the world find groups such as ISIS as disgusting as you do but let's persecute all muslims for the actions of a few?
 
Likes: 2 people
May 2016
3,670
916
california
#6
Well there's a lightening rod for this blog. Continuing the flow, how about, I don't see how we can have a moral society in this country as most authority in this country seems to have replaced religion of any kind with a sort of base that all human actions are as allowable pathologies to be addressed by a scientific governing authority.
 

Djinn

Council Hall
Dec 2007
51,069
37,591
Pennsylvania, USA
#7
Well there's a lightening rod for this blog. Continuing the flow, how about, I don't see how we can have a moral society in this country as most authority in this country seems to have replaced religion of any kind with a sort of base that all human actions are as allowable pathologies to be addressed by a scientific governing authority.
I noticed that you use the word "all" in your post. I'm pretty sure you didn't mean to, since it hamstrings your argument.
 
Likes: 2 people

Djinn

Council Hall
Dec 2007
51,069
37,591
Pennsylvania, USA
#9
Well if you're going to nitpick...
Absolutely. If you're going to say that "a scientific governing authority views all human actions are as allowable pathologies," you'd best be able to back that up with something.

Because it's completely untrue. I'm guessing that you're expressing your displeasure with the growing acceptance of the gay and/or transgender community, but that hardly begins to cover "all human actions."
 
Likes: 3 people

Rorschach

Former Staff
Aug 2012
53,875
20,201
america
#10
I do not think that it is immoral to it's core, but.....it is still stuck in the societal culture of 14th Century Arabic Tribalism.

That, and it is outwardly aggressive in spreading Islamic ideology.

What Islam NEEDS is a "Reformation" movement, as Christianity endured. Even though, that was between Protestants and Catholics, the Reformation moved both closer towards the actual core of the religion.

But, let's not forget that said reformation was violent to it's core, at some points.
 
Likes: 2 people

Similar Discussions