Mueller's report on Russia and Trump to be made public Thursday

Dec 2015
11,474
6,877
From Your Heart!
#1
Mueller's report on Russia and Trump to be made public Thursday
The document is expected to contain substantial portions that have been blacked out by the attorney general for various reason.
By Julia Ainsley and Dartunorro Clark

"Special counsel Robert Mueller's redacted report on the Russia investigation and President Donald Trump is expected to be made public Thursday morning, the Justice Department said Monday."
"(W)hile this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him," the special counsel said in his report, according to Barr's letter."









#####################################################################################
We shall see what was seen fit to reveal to the American public that has a right to know about this report.
 
Likes: Friday13
Feb 2011
15,762
10,186
The formerly great golden state
#2
Mueller's report on Russia and Trump to be made public Thursday
The document is expected to contain substantial portions that have been blacked out by the attorney general for various reason.
By Julia Ainsley and Dartunorro Clark













#####################################################################################
We shall see what was seen fit to reveal to the American public that has a right to know about this report.

Well, if it doesn't exonerate him, then it must be fake news.

Seriously, it's good that this report is being made public. Next step: an unredacted version for Congress.
 
May 2012
65,129
12,427
By the wall
#3
Well, if it doesn't exonerate him, then it must be fake news.

Seriously, it's good that this report is being made public. Next step: an unredacted version for Congress.
It would be against the law for him to redact the entire thing.

It's redacted because people have legal protection to keep their testimony secret.

What you are saying is that we should force every reporter to reveal their sources because we have a right to know.
 
Mar 2019
802
321
California
#4
It would be against the law for him to redact the entire thing.

It's redacted because people have legal protection to keep their testimony secret.

What you are saying is that we should force every reporter to reveal their sources because we have a right to know.
Actually, I wouldn't mind that. It would sure dry up the Fake News phony "Sources".
 
May 2012
65,129
12,427
By the wall
#5
Actually, I wouldn't mind that. It would sure dry up the Fake News phony "Sources".
I wouldn't mind it either but he would end up in prison so I doubt he will do it.

Funny the libs don't understand this.

And honestly, there is nothing in that report that is going to get Trump in trouble, he has been cleared already, so him redacting things not related to testimony or witnesses would be pointless.

Trump has nothing to fear whatsoever.

This is just the desperate last grasp from the left.
 
Mar 2019
802
321
California
#6
I wouldn't mind it either but he would end up in prison so I doubt he will do it.

Funny the libs don't understand this.

And honestly, there is nothing in that report that is going to get Trump in trouble, he has been cleared already, so him redacting things not related to testimony or witnesses would be pointless.

Trump has nothing to fear whatsoever.

This is just the desperate last grasp from the left.
Not really. The Dems would rather see America fall than give up the FACT that they LOST.
 
Likes: Spookycolt
Jul 2011
34,251
2,609
Tennessee
#8
Mueller's report on Russia and Trump to be made public Thursday
The document is expected to contain substantial portions that have been blacked out by the attorney general for various reason.
By Julia Ainsley and Dartunorro Clark













#####################################################################################
We shall see what was seen fit to reveal to the American public that has a right to know about this report.
"seen fit to reveal"

The lie that never dies!!
 
Feb 2011
15,762
10,186
The formerly great golden state
#10
It would be against the law for him to redact the entire thing.

It's redacted because people have legal protection to keep their testimony secret.

What you are saying is that we should force every reporter to reveal their sources because we have a right to know.

They could remove some of the names, sure. But, because something is "classified" doesn't mean Congress can't see it.