Pres Trump can legally "out" the whistleblower

Sep 2016
23,126
18,112
My own world
Guilty of exactly what and if there's such strong evidence of guilt on the phone call why this so called investigation? Why not file articles of impeachment based on the incriminating phone call itself?
Due process. It's what Trump and the GOP and you have been wanting. You got it.
 
  • Love
Reactions: the bull59
Apr 2014
38,783
25,120
Maryland
Ah yes ...

Bill Krystol ....

The psychologically disturbed Never Trumper who killed the Weekly Standard with his Trump hatred.

And, how do you out someone who does not qualify under the Whistleblower Protection Act ..... :think:
The reason all these right wing journalists dislike Trump Is because He is a danger to our country and people like you don’t care that the whistleblower could be killed. But it’s a good distraction. If somebody warned about Ted bundy , you’d care more about the messenger than the actual message
 
  • Love
Reactions: the bull59

Babba

Former Staff
Jul 2007
77,882
69,699
So. Md.
The so-called Whistleblower started this whole charade and he needs to be put under oath and answer questions.
Who told him to go to Schiff? What did Schiff tell him? Who actually wrote his complaint, since it was written lawyerly?
Since he never actually heard Trump's call, who told him about it? What did they say? Did his former boss at the CIA, Brennan, who hates Trump, tell him what to write? Why did the Whistleblower go to a lawyer who bragged about a coup against Trump?
First of all, it's not unusual for WBs to consult Congress. In this case, the WB did not speak with Schiff himself, but Schiff's staff who told him/her to contact the IG. The IG has spoken with the people who the WB got the info from and the IG found the WB's complaint to be credible. So what if lawyers wrote the complaint. It is perfectly normal for someone in that position to retain legal representation.

The whistleblower who raised concerns about President Donald Trump’s dealings with Ukraine spoke to staffers on the House Intelligence Committee before filing a formal complaint, giving Democrats advance warning of the accusations of wrongdoing that triggered their impeachment inquiry.

The whistleblower, a member of the intelligence community, contacted the committee for guidance on how to report “possible wrongdoing,” according to Patrick Boland, a spokesman for the Intelligence Committee’s chairman, Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif. Boland said that “at no point did the committee review or receive the complaint in advance” and that it is a regular occurrence for whistleblowers to seek guidance from the committee.

“Consistent with the committee’s longstanding procedures, committee staff appropriately advised the whistleblower to contact an inspector general and to seek legal counsel,” Boland said. Other congressional committees follow a similar process.

The New York Times first reported the interaction.

The revelation that Democrats had spoken to the whistleblower, whose identity is not publicly known, added a new detail to the sequence of events surrounding the complaint. It could explain why Schiff quickly sounded alarm when the acting director of national intelligence withheld the complaint from Congress last month.
 
  • Love
Reactions: the bull59

Rev. Hellh0und

Former Staff
Jul 2011
68,041
13,953
315 bowery/DMS
Do you enjoy endangering people's lives. That's pretty sick.
The only thing that he is in danger of is a million dollar book deal.


and If im sick. For repeating a publicly known name, how “sick” are you and your behavior towards sandmann, a kid? You had no problem “endangering” a kids life....

Wouldn't that make you worse than me?
 
  • Like
Reactions: John T Ford

Babba

Former Staff
Jul 2007
77,882
69,699
So. Md.
The only thing that he is in danger of is a million dollar book deal.


and If im sick. For repeating a publicly known name, how “sick” are you and your behavior towards sandmann, a kid? You had no problem “endangering” a kids life....

Wouldn't that make you worse than me?
He/she wants to remain anonymous and that name is only "known" by the right wing.

What is the point of outing this WB?

Sandmann's life was never in danger and you know it.
 
  • Love
Reactions: the bull59
Jan 2015
53,829
16,057
Great State of Texas
The reason all these right wing journalists dislike Trump Is because He is a danger to our country and people like you don’t care that the whistleblower could be killed. But it’s a good distraction. If somebody warned about Ted bundy , you’d care more about the messenger than the actual message
First of all .... there are less than a handful of psychos out there like Bill Krystol.

And, secondly .... this guy is no whistleblower .... by legal definition.

But, you would never know that, only being capable of parroting the Fake News MSM, and all.