Trump Wanted Immigration Detainees Sent to Sanctuary Cities

Jul 2014
63,469
51,776
CA
The proposal was discussed and rejected because it would be illegal . Which means the only people that were given anything were Trump's bigoted demographically anxious base . Once again he's got them all cued up over something he has no intention of doing . It a small minority of Americans this base . They are ones being laughed at. By the rest of America and the whole world .
What is so funny, it that apparently he does not even know what he ranting and raving about...again


PHOENIX (AP) – An idea floated by President Donald Trump to send immigrants from the border to “sanctuary cities” to exact revenge on Democratic foes could end up doing the migrants a favor by placing them in locations that make it easier to put down roots and stay in the country.

The plan would put thousands of immigrants in cities that are not only welcoming to them, but also more likely to rebuff federal officials carrying out deportation orders. Many of these locations have more resources to help immigrants make their legal cases to stay in the United States than smaller cities, with some of the nation’s biggest immigration advocacy groups based in places like San Francisco, New York City and Chicago. The downside for the immigrants would be a high cost of living in the cities.

The Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse at Syracuse University announced this week that an analysis found the likelihood of an immigrant in sanctuary cities such as New York and Los Angeles are 20% less likely to be arrested out in the community than in places without such policies.

“With immigrants being less likely to commit crimes than the U.S. born population, and with sanctuary jurisdictions being safer and more productive than non-sanctuary jurisdictions, the data damns this proposal as a politically motivated stunt that seeks to play politics with peoples’ lives,” said George Gascon, district attorney for San Francisco.

Trump Sanctuary City Idea Could Help Some Immigrants
 
Jul 2011
89,719
54,676
becoming more and more
So basically, you want America to take in Asylum seekers but not at your cost or in your town. Don't you think that's pretty bad, moralistic speaking?
Your entire opposition to asylum in America is based on the cost. You're upset about it even though you don't even live in America . Of course people would be concerned about how any particular event would impact their town. If you're so upset about way over in the UK, why wouldn't they be? Makes more sense for them to be than someone oceans away. Don't ya think?
 
Jul 2013
37,609
23,860
On a happy trail
Yes they will, make them check in to an office every two to three days, part of the conditions. If they fail to check in, when they get located, kicked them out.

Tag them with GPS locators.

Electronic tags

I hope you didn't believe for one moment it was dump and forget?
LOL

What offices are you talking about? Sanctuary cities most likely don't have them. And won't participate in your authoritarian BS where the worth of every human being must calculated and monetized.
 
Nov 2015
5,078
1,573
UK
Your entire opposition to asylum in America is based on the cost. You're upset about it even though you don't even live in America . Of course people would be concerned about how any particular event would impact their town. If you're so upset about way over in the UK, why wouldn't they be? Makes more sense for them to be than someone oceans away. Don't ya think?
Cost and the problems it brings.

I like how you totally ignored the question and went straight to deflection.
 
Feb 2011
15,762
10,186
The formerly great golden state
So basically, you want America to take in Asylum seekers but not at your cost or in your town. Don't you think that's pretty bad, moralistic speaking?
The whole country is my country. There really is no need for one town to do the job, but, if Trump and his administration continue to fall down on the job, it may have to come to that.

Not that Trump really is going to send the refugees to San Francisco. He's just ranting and hooting once again.
 
Nov 2015
5,078
1,573
UK
LOL

What offices are you talking about? Sanctuary cities most likely don't have them. And won't participate in your authoritarian BS where the worth of every human being must calculated and monetized.
Is this the twilight zone. If the cities don't have any suitable office, set one up. Did that not cross your mind?? They haven't a choice if the government want to tag them, why should it bother the asylum seekers? They'll be in a safe place with their "American" friends.
 
Nov 2015
5,078
1,573
UK
The whole country is my country. There really is no need for one town to do the job, but, if Trump and his administration continue to fall down on the job, it may have to come to that.

Not that Trump really is going to send the refugees to San Francisco. He's just ranting and hooting once again.
That's why there's an 's' on the end of Sanctuary Cities. So those cities can each enjoy them.
 
Oct 2013
25,645
21,801
USA
The flaw in his revenge thinking is these immigrant refugees will be here legally. It is an insult to legal immigrants that he can't even distinguish between illegal and legal. Trump simply has no respect for brown people no matter how they got here.
 
Likes: Panzareta
Jan 2018
636
325
Houston, TX
I know that there are many here who think just like the idiot in the White House, but you don't govern by seeking revenge. He really is nothing more than a third grader. Behavior like this is not presidential. How can you people continue to support such a horrible human being. Using vulnerable people as pawns in his childish games is sick. The man is deranged. And Stephen Miller is a monster.



https://www.cnn.com/2019/04/11/politics/immigrant-detainees-sanctuary-cities/index.html
Send them to every sanctuary city. Funny how now you think this is not OK. So you have a severe case of Nimby!
If these idiots want them here then give them what they want. Perfect.