Trump Wants Whistleblower ‘Exposed and Questioned’

Singularity

Moderator
Oct 2009
33,580
28,281
Kansas
The transcript proves the whistleblower is not a whistleblower but, instead a leaker with some serioius conflicts of interest.

They will not remain anonymous long.

The claim of protected whistleblower status is bogus and will not continue to stand.
That's up to the IG, and if Trump continues to pressure for the WB to be exposed and punished while the WB's status is affirmed by the appropriate officials, HE is violating the law and he will eventually answer for it. It is not Trump's decision. The law is explicitly set up to keep the president from doing what he is attempting to do.

At great risk to his future tenure, the acting DNI testified under oath that he believes the WB has done everything appropriately. You can't get around that.
 
  • Love
Reactions: the bull59

Chief

Former Staff
Nov 2009
33,511
21,993
SoCal
Agree except the revelation that the original whistleblower had ties to a 2020 democratic candidate certainly does change things a bit. Doesnt invalidate any testimony but puts a bit of bumble in the way as it gives Trump the talking point that his campaign was infiltrated. As I said earlier, imagine if a Trump supporter was working inside a Warren campaign, would anyone find them credible?

It's useless to slice and dice people that way. If we take out all the folks who have any ties to Reps or Dems, who is left to run things?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Babba and steezer

Singularity

Moderator
Oct 2009
33,580
28,281
Kansas
It's useless to slice and dice people that way. If we take out all the folks who have any ties to Reps or Dems, who is left to run things?
Yeah Axios knows that, everyone who is qualified to work on this level in D.C. has a career that is firmly woven throughout both political parties and other political entities, that or they directly work for someone who has. But the juicy headline "WB might be a Biden supporter" is too hard to resist.

It is irrelevant. There are safeguards against politicized actions, namely the Trump appointed IG and Trump appointed DNI. Both affirm the WB's actions.
 
  • Love
Reactions: the bull59

Chief

Former Staff
Nov 2009
33,511
21,993
SoCal
I am willing to bet that the Leaker is a former Joe Biden campaign worker.
You are suggesting a CIA agent attached to a prestigious detail in the white house was something as entry level as a campaign worker, as recently as 3 years ago?

lmao

You really should read your thoughts and think twice before hitting post.
 
  • Love
Reactions: the bull59

Singularity

Moderator
Oct 2009
33,580
28,281
Kansas
The transcript has proven the Leaker to be a liar.

There was no quid pro quo ....

You are parroting fake news.
You haven't read the WB's complaint John, and you just proved it

There is no allegation of quid pro quo, anywhere in it. The words "quid pro quo" don't appear in it.

You don't read anything aside from GOP-favorable headlines.
 

Chief

Former Staff
Nov 2009
33,511
21,993
SoCal
The transcript has proven the Leaker to be a liar.

There was no quid pro quo ....

You are parroting fake news.
What transcript?

You mean the fake document that was just a cherry picked summary and then presented to Trump enablers as a "transcript".

Sorry, that's not real. If it was, there would be no reason to hide the recording of the call.
 
  • Love
Reactions: the bull59

Singularity

Moderator
Oct 2009
33,580
28,281
Kansas
You are suggesting a CIA agent attached to a prestigious detail in the white house was something as entry level as a campaign worker, as recently as 3 years ago?

lmao

You really should read your thoughts and think twice before hitting post.
My bet is that the WB once worked for or with Biden's Senate office, or served as an intelligence adviser during his time as vice president.