Whistleblower has ties to a 2020 Democratic candidate?

Sep 2007
23,024
15,684
N48 51.489 E2 17.67119
Ok, this looks bad. I hope it isnt true. He/she will surely be outed.

Intelligence Community Inspector General Michael Atkinson told lawmakers last week that the whistleblower whose complaint about President Trump and Ukraine has set off an impeachment inquiry previously had "some type of professional relationship" with one of the 2020 Democratic candidates, Axios' Jonathan Swan has confirmed.

Atkinson wrote in an Aug. 26 letter that the whistleblower demonstrated "some indicia of an arguable political bias ... in favor of a rival political candidate." CNN later reported that the whistleblower is a registered Democrat, which Trump allies have used in an effort to undermine their credibility. Much of the information laid out in the whistleblower's original complaint has since been substantiated.

Atkinson did not say which Democratic candidate or in what capacity the whistleblower worked. A source tells Axios that it was unclear whether the working relationship was in the course of government service or more political.

Well, as the situation unfolds, you have Democrats and Criminals (formally Republicans).
 

Libertine

Moderator
Apr 2015
15,908
3,079
Katmandu
Ok, this looks bad. I hope it isnt true. He/she will surely be outed.

Intelligence Community Inspector General Michael Atkinson told lawmakers last week that the whistleblower whose complaint about President Trump and Ukraine has set off an impeachment inquiry previously had "some type of professional relationship" with one of the 2020 Democratic candidates, Axios' Jonathan Swan has confirmed.

Atkinson wrote in an Aug. 26 letter that the whistleblower demonstrated "some indicia of an arguable political bias ... in favor of a rival political candidate." CNN later reported that the whistleblower is a registered Democrat, which Trump allies have used in an effort to undermine their credibility. Much of the information laid out in the whistleblower's original complaint has since been substantiated.

Atkinson did not say which Democratic candidate or in what capacity the whistleblower worked. A source tells Axios that it was unclear whether the working relationship was in the course of government service or more political.

Of course it's true, that's why they were hidden to start this which hunt. They went to Schiff before the IG, and it was orchestrated from there.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GoaTlOver

Lunchboxxy

Moderator
Apr 2010
20,962
25,316
Oregon
Yes they can.

The transcript has already proven them to be LIARS.

It doesn't matter what they say.

The phone call in question has already been released.

But, you prefer the fake news over the facts ....

We get it!!
lol what planet do you live on? Did you not read the transcript?

the transcript and the WH’s own admissions have already corroborated the principal claims of the whistle blower.
 

Lunchboxxy

Moderator
Apr 2010
20,962
25,316
Oregon
Of course it's true, that's why they were hidden to start this which hunt. They went to Schiff before the IG, and it was orchestrated from there.
Not true. They went to aids for the intel committee for guidance. The aids followed the rules and advised the WB to follow the proper procedures for a whistleblower.

Everything was done by the book by both parties.
 

Lunchboxxy

Moderator
Apr 2010
20,962
25,316
Oregon
Yet Nancy foolishly and thoughtfully acted on it, there was never anything there.
the WH themselves released a transcript where the president specifically asks a foreign power to fabricate an investigation into his political opponent and his family. It’s an open and shut abuse of power.

Text messages from the state department further show a quid pro quo where a WH meeting was dependent of the president of Ukraine agreeing to investigation’s into a server conspiracy as well as into Biden’s son’s company.

To say there is nothing there would mean ignoring all the evidence the WH themselves have released