White House: Mueller has not subpoenaed Trump’s bank records

Dec 2014
17,390
6,262
The Milky Way
White House: Mueller has not subpoenaed Trump’s bank records


White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders on Tuesday disputed reports that special counsel Robert Mueller has subpoenaed President Trump’s bank records.

“We confirmed that the news reports [that] the special counsel had subpoenaed financial records related to the president are completely false,” Sanders said during the daily press briefing.

“No subpoena has been issued or received. We have confirmed this with the bank and other sources. I think this is another example of the media going too far and too fast and we don't see it going in that direction," she said.

White House: Mueller has not subpoenaed Trump?s bank records | TheHill
 
Sep 2016
21,355
15,901
My own world
White House: Mueller has not subpoenaed Trump’s bank records





White House: Mueller has not subpoenaed Trump?s bank records | TheHill
Why are Trump supporters still believing the WH and FOX news? Didn't the Seth Rich story and the crowd size at the inauguration teach you people anything? They lie about stuff that is easy to prove is a lie and about stupid stuff. FOX news and the WH are themselves FAKE NEWS !!!

The subpoena was earlier reported by German daily Handelsblatt.

NPR has confirmed Deutsche Bank got a subpoena

https://www.npr.org/2017/12/05/56856...rse-with-trump

The subpoena was confirmed to have been received by a spokesman of the bank for the first time in a German newspaper.If you read German nock yourself out.
http://www.handelsblatt.com/my/finan...j6fXZROEwv-ap1

"Seit langem sind die Geschäftsverbindungen zwischen Donald Trump und der Deutschen Bank Gegenstand heftiger politischer Kontroversen. Nun muss das Institut Kontodaten aus dem Umfeld Trumps offenlegen."
 

the watchman

Former Staff
Jul 2011
93,554
60,062
becoming more and more
The WH would not know one way or the other.

More fake news from Sanders.
presumably, the bank would notify them so that they'd have a chance to contest the release of the records. Not sure though as I'm not a lawyer. There might be a way to get records without notifying the account holder. Like if the feds had credible concerns that the account holder might try to hide the evidence.
 
Last edited:
Dec 2014
17,390
6,262
The Milky Way
The OP seems accurate, as the target has a right to know that their records are under subpoena. Why? They have a right to attack the subpoena. Then again, the dirty Weissmann is behind much of this.
 
Sep 2014
56,061
11,612
United States
Keep in mind the thread announcing the subpoena was started by Cpicturetaker, with a link to rawsewage using anonymous sources.

The Trifacta of fail.