Speaking of begging the question... Pelosi and three committee chairpersons are not "THE HOUSE." The actual House is in recess and if these committees are doing to undertake their claimed inquiry then they will have to do so with the full participation of the members of those committees. It also means, as the thread title notes, that since this is claimed as general oversight versus special and specific oversight that would occur within the impeachment proceedings that subpoenas and other powers being claimed won't have full force and resolution of that will have to happen in the courts, or the House will vote for the actual proceedings.Those points, such as they are, still beg the question whether a vote by the full House is REQUIRED BEFORE the HOUSE conducts an impeachment inquiry. Nobody has proven that it is, even though trump worshipers are still claiming it.
Let's not focus on whether a fellow forum poster said something wrong or wasn't the best at explaining a position. None of us are going to directly control or influence these matters.But trump worshipers (and their hero, for that matter) are objecting to even “three house committee chairpersons sending a letter while the House is in recess” without a full House vote. They’re the ones essentially calling the recent activities an impeachment inquiry, and are insisting on a full House vote BEFORE conducting further inquiries. They simply have not provided any legal, constitutional or parliamentary justification for that position, despite being asked repeatedly.
I did NOT claim “that three house committee chairpersons sending a letter while the House is in recess.”
Oh, and your last question is a typical gotcha type question (“. . . or can the chairperson just usurp the power . . . “), suggesting bad faith on your part. You won’t answer my question, but you want me to answer yours. That’s dishonest.
The White House's letter to Congress is expected to contend that for impeachment to be legitimate, all members in the chambers must have a chance to support or oppose it. Supporters have been making that case for some time already.
The White House demand for a full vote represented the latest tactical skirmish within the broader political war over impeachment, which has sucked all the oxygen out of official Washington and largely sidelined other business between the administration and Congress.
Trump's challenge about a vote also is an attempt to force Pelosi to truly test which of her moderate members, some of whom were elected last year in districts that Trump carried in 2016, are prepared to go on record in support of impeachment.
What's more, Collins argues, what he calls a "real" impeachment would permit more of what he called "due process" for the House minority. As it stands, normal procedure in the chamber means that majority Democrats can convene hearings, call witnesses and issue subpoenas. Minority Republicans can't.
If the ongoing House impeachment is real, for Collins and Republicans, they too would get those powers and be able to mount an equal defense of Trump.
If he could, he'd have done so already. In fact, this WH has bent over backwards to AVOID EP claims generally. They've claimed even more expansive privilege and been told by courts it doesn't exist.You are correct. The President can claim Executive Privilege and tell Pelosi to pzz up a rope.
We know already who would vote for it. They've made public declarations. Complete List: Who Supports an Impeachment Inquiry Against Trump?Besides ,I bet the old bat doesn't HAVE the votes.
Just because impeachment happens rarely doesn't mean it isn't traditional. It's in the Constitution, FCOL. And Congress's power over the executive branch comes in oversight as well as lawmaking. They oversee the operations of the government all the time. That's quite traditional.It is the realm of the executive branch in fact it is what Congress often calls for a Special Prosecutor in instances that have led to impeachment. Asking the Executive Branch to investigate itself is more within the powers designated each branch than asking Congress to step outside their traditional role of making law rather than enforcing it.
Not sure what this last part means.The rare times they trade one for the other is impeachment. A few "rule changes" cannot make Congress into the executive branch and cannot declare that as an everyday norm, they engage in law enforcement under the guise of oversight.
Not sure what this report proves. It tells you want each side thinks, but I can't imagine how a statement of opinion from an Republican is EVIDENCE of anything.A more objective report on this matter (that's one where you can't tell the writer's point of view, AKA Journalism). I have quoted the quotes that support my view. But you can go through the same article and just quote the Democrats to get their views. If all news outlets handled all stories this way we wouldn't be at each other's throats. For example an analysis of the Ukraine phone call would fully explore the legal angles of Trumps "asks" from both party's points of view. I'll bet a lot of you think there is only one take ...... yours.
Trump Challenges House On Impeachment Vote. Pelosi Says She's Unmoved
Journalism is quoting sources so that the subject is covered. Proving something, when the topic has multiple sides and is not factually based, is exactly what Journalism is not supposed to do. You read the whole piece and find out what people are thinking and get enough information to do your own research.Not sure what this report proves. It tells you want each side thinks, but I can't imagine how a statement of opinion from an Republican is EVIDENCE of anything.
|Recent Similar Discussions||Forum||Date|
|White House Aides Feared That Trump Had Another Ukraine Back Channel||Current Events|
|White House Personnel Director Tells Trump Top DHS Picks Are Ineligible||Current Events|
|Trump has awarded next year’s G-7 summit of world leaders to his Miami-area resort, the White House said||Current Events|
|House Democrats will not hold a vote authorizing impeachment probe, which White House sought||Current Events|
|Recent Similar Discussions|
|White House Aides Feared That Trump Had Another Ukraine Back Channel|
|White House Personnel Director Tells Trump Top DHS Picks Are Ineligible|
|Trump has awarded next year’s G-7 summit of world leaders to his Miami-area resort, the White House said|
|House Democrats will not hold a vote authorizing impeachment probe, which White House sought|