Why Netanyahu, The Churchill Of Our Time, Must Speak Before Congress

B04

Aug 2014
15,199
6,258
gone
Why Netanyahu, The Churchill Of Our Time, Must Speak Before Congress

It is fitting and proper–indeed essential for our very security–that Speaker John Boehner has extended an invitation to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin “Bibi” Netanyahu to address Congress on Iran and its efforts to develop nuclear weapons and the missiles to deliver them anywhere in the world. The invitation has bipartisan support because many members on both sides of the aisle recognize the fundamental threat to world peace that a nuclear-armed Iran would pose.
It’s a message much of Europe and even segments of the US, particularly in the Obama administration, don’t want to hear. The President has made clear his intense dislike of Israel’s prime minister and his refusal to keep quiet about Obama’s desire to conclude a Neville Chamberlain-like deal with Teheran. In a flagrant interference in another country’s election, Obama operatives are working hard in Israel to help bring down the courageous Prime Minister.
Another factor Obama and his appeasement-minded minions willfully ignore is the existential threat Iran poses to Israel. Given the size of the Jewish state, it has no room for error. A nuclear-armed Iran will put Israeli leaders in a dangerous, hair-trigger situation. Israel is a crucial US ally, strategically and morally. It is the only durable democracy in the Mideast. With only 8 million people, Israel has surpassed the European Union, with a population of over 400 million, in high technology, rivaling Silicon Valley. It was born from the ashes of the Holocaust. The destruction of Israel would mean, ultimately, the end of Western civilization; the moral rot that would permit such an event would be just about impossible to surmount.
President Obama is either oblivious to all this or feels that in his perverted worldview, these things don’t much matter. Iran knows Obama desperately wants an agreement. It figures that the more it refuses to accept Obama’s willingness to surrender, the more concessions he will offer.
Which gets to why Speaker John Boehner was well within his bounds to extend that invitation to Netanyahu. Such a momentous treaty with Iran as desired by Obama must, under the Constitution, be submitted to the US Senate for ratification. Obama has trampled on the Constitution time and again–making laws and changing laws at will–and wants no Congressional involvement precisely because the resultant debate would glaringly show what a dangerously miserable deal he had cut. The ranking Democrat on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Robert Menendez, recently declared: “The more I hear from the Administration and its quotes, the more it sounds like talking points that come straight out of Teheran.” When President Obama declared in his State of the Union Address that Iran has “halted the progress of its nuclear program and reduced its stockpile of nuclear material,” the guffaws could be loudly heard from every intelligence agency in the world.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people

B04

Aug 2014
15,199
6,258
gone
Because evidently Republicans treasure the opinions of foreign heads of state/warmongers. I prefer to support a president who represents the interests of ME and MINE.
So, you disapprove of Obama having any head of state visit the White House? Or, is it okay when a Democrat gets the opinions of a foreign head of state?

I guess that's just, different, huh. (rolls eyes)
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
Sep 2013
46,510
37,678
On a hill
So, you disapprove of Obama having any head of state visit the White House? Or, is it okay when a Democrat gets the opinions of a foreign head of state?

I guess that's just, different, huh. (rolls eyes)
Is visiting the White House the same as addressing Congress?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people

Rorschach

Former Staff
Aug 2012
53,875
20,202
america
VERY GOOD Comparison.

In fact...most of the negative things said about Netenyahu, are incredibly similar to those said about Churchill, prior to him being proven right about almost every single prediction he made.......
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people

Nicnam

Former Staff
Dec 2013
15,001
4,043
-
Good article, thanks

I wholly agree with this portion OP quoted

"President Obama is either oblivious to all this or feels that in his perverted worldview, these things don’t much matter. Iran knows Obama desperately wants an agreement. It figures that the more it refuses to accept Obama’s willingness to surrender, the more concessions he will offer".
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people

Rorschach

Former Staff
Aug 2012
53,875
20,202
america
Good article, thanks

I wholly agree with this portion OP quoted

"President Obama is either oblivious to all this or feels that in his perverted worldview, these things don’t much matter. Iran knows Obama desperately wants an agreement. It figures that the more it refuses to accept Obama’s willingness to surrender, the more concessions he will offer".
LOL, well, ALL the similarities between Netenyahu and Churchill, PALE in comparison and number of the similarities between Hussein Obama and Neville Chamberlain.

SERIOUSLY!

Would it suprise anyone, if Glorious Organizer stepped off a plane, waving a sheet of paper around, spouting off about "Peace in Our Time...????" (To hordes of lefties praising him, of course.....)?????
 
Sep 2013
46,510
37,678
On a hill
LOL, well, ALL the similarities between Netenyahu and Churchill, PALE in comparison and number of the similarities between Hussein Obama and Neville Chamberlain.

SERIOUSLY!

Would it suprise anyone, if Glorious Organizer stepped off a plane, waving a sheet of paper around, spouting off about "Peace in Our Time...????" (To hordes of lefties praising him, of course.....)?????
How does nailing OBL fit into your analogy?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person