Yeah, "let's move Forward..."

Aug 2013
3,416
1,744
Road Less Traveled
#2
You don't like how things are done in NK? Huh....it's the model of pure plutocracy taken to the logical conclusion.
 
Aug 2013
3,416
1,744
Road Less Traveled
#4
Um, North Korea is a socialist state, so it's more your style. Forward, bitchezs...
Um, North Korea is a dictatorship and one man has all of the money. That's the logical conclusion of plutocracy.

If they were practicing socialism, they'd have electricity, food for the masses and a much smaller military.

Do you really want to argue that North Korea is an example of pure socialism? I hope so.
 
Likes: 2 people
May 2012
68,350
13,601
By the wall
#5
Um, North Korea is a dictatorship and one man has all of the money. That's the logical conclusion of plutocracy.

If they were practicing socialism, they'd have electricity, food for the masses and a much smaller military.

Do you really want to argue that North Korea is an example of pure socialism? I hope so.
Nobody actually knows what type of ideology is in North Korea.

It could be a plutocracy or a dictatorship (unlikely) but its probably a case of militarism.

I have no doubt that the military runs the show over there.
 
Aug 2012
10,696
2,782
#6
Um, North Korea is a dictatorship and one man has all of the money. That's the logical conclusion of plutocracy.

If they were practicing socialism, they'd have electricity, food for the masses and a much smaller military.

Do you really want to argue that North Korea is an example of pure socialism? I hope so.
It's how it always ends up. You guys keep demanding we give an example of pure libertarianism, but the truth is that you guys can't point to a successful socialist or communist nation either, because the political leaders always end up becoming dictators (for the good of the "people" of course) and keeping them in poverty because that system just doesn't fricking work!
 
Aug 2013
3,416
1,744
Road Less Traveled
#7
It's how it always ends up. You guys keep demanding we give an example of pure libertarianism, but the truth is that you guys can't point to a successful socialist or communist nation either, because the political leaders always end up becoming dictators (for the good of the "people" of course) and keeping them in poverty because that system just doesn't fricking work!
We aren't trying to "point to a successful socialist or communist nation". We're not socialists or communists. That's just the straw man you need to blather on with your scholarly dissertations on the merits of plutocracy.
 
Likes: 1 person
Aug 2012
10,696
2,782
#8
We aren't trying to "point to a successful socialist or communist nation". We're not socialists or communists. That's just the straw man you need to blather on with your scholarly dissertations on the merits of plutocracy.
Yeah, that's the story I keep getting from you guys. And then I ask a simple question like look over the Communist Party USA platform and tell us what you disagree with:

CPUSA Program » cpusa

And all I ever get is crickets or the occasional lame "that's an irrelevant question." But as I look over that web page, it sure seems to line up pretty good with what you guys keep saying you want. Why do you suppose that is (since you guys aren't communists and all)?
 
May 2012
68,350
13,601
By the wall
#9
The saying is that capitalism will lead to a plutocracy as communism will lead to an oligarchy.

Almost constantly.
 
Feb 2011
40,024
9,769
happyfunville
#10
Yeah, that's the story I keep getting from you guys. And then I ask a simple question like look over the Communist Party USA platform and tell us what you disagree with:

CPUSA Program » cpusa

And all I ever get is crickets or the occasional lame "that's an irrelevant question." But as I look over that web page, it sure seems to line up pretty good with what you guys keep saying you want. Why do you suppose that is (since you guys aren't communists and all)?
Liars always ignore evidence of their lies. Look at Obama.
 

Similar Discussions